Boethius Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Boethius - Essay ExampleIn this case, the inf exclusivelyible sparing of deity is privy to all prox events and whatever actions a rational creature sets out to do have actually been predetermined. except, this is expiry against the concept of freedom of choice, this is be perplex the premise for legitimate free provide would settle of a non-predetermined course of topics since freedom can be loosely defined as a the will by a rational creature to determine its own life and destiny independently. Thus, concisely if God is all knowing, can non be wrong, and he knows of the human destiny and future action, then it translates that mans future is predetermined in Gods knowledge of its occurrence and in these premise the concept of free will is fallacious. Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius is unrivaled of the sages who have had significant impact on this debate he posited a solution for this problem which he claims was shown to him in a vision by lady philosophy while he was locke d up in prison. On free will he says the fact that humans are capable of cogitate center they possess free will, reason enables them to make logical judgments which translate to decisions (Flew, 175). Therefore, they have the ability and capacity to specify what should be included or excluded from their lives. He further classifies freedom consequently humans are freest when contemplating philosophically and least free when engaged in addictive behavior and bound in earthly fetters. However lady philosophy tells him that, God can foresee our future and puts everyone in the situations that are best fitted for their collapse needs in his infinite and infallible wisdom. However, this begs the question which had been earlier discussed before that, if the infallible God knows our actions and it is undoable that he is wrong, how then can we claim to have free will, this is because to justify perfect foresight, either what is going to happen must be foresees by him or what he sees mu st invariably come to pass, nevertheless in either case, human freedom is nullified. The solution offered by lady philosophy and which Boethius proposes is that God does not know or see things in the same way as man, he is eternal and the ult present and future are simultaneous to him. He does not exist in the same lay dimensions as humans thus despite the fact that tomorrow is yet to be, he sees it as we do the present, therefore he knows what will happen without directing it to happen (Flew 176). Therefore, the knowledge of God transcends all that is in the temporal and spatial realms as perceived by man and it exists in the simplicity of a unanalyzable present, thus Gods knowledge is not future knowledge but awareness of a consistent present. In other words, one should not think of providence as the causative agent in the cause of things, they happen independently and providence only foresees them because they will happen not to make them happen. In my opinion, Boethius reaso ning is not tenable, his arguments go round in circles and coming back to the same point, because he wants to justify dickens diametrically opposed ideas and makes it appear that both are logical. At the end of the day, if we agree God all knows, his transcendence of time will not change the fact that humans are immersed in it, thus events in his continuous present are occur to humans in different times. Thus, the fact that thing happen as they do, and God presumably is aware of them means free will remains and illusion. However, to scoop from a biblical reasoning, God knows an individual even when they are in